Table of Contents

Flowchart

Is Your Non-Human Identity Security Mature Enough?

TL;DR: This decision tree helps organizations assess how effectively they are securing non-human identities and workload access. It highlights why traditional user IAM controls do not fully address machine-to-machine access and explores alternatives such as automated credential management, dynamic policy-based access, and conditional access based on workload security posture. The flow chart guides teams through key questions to uncover gaps in their current identity and access strategy.

Aembit Team

Product & Research

Published Sep 2024

Updated Sep 2024

50:1

Non-human to human identities

18

Agent threat classes mapped

0

Long-lived secrets required

Aembit Workload Identity Decision Tree
No form · instant

Download the Flowchart

Free jpg · no email required

Table of Contents

User IAM, encompassing traditional user identities and their access rights within systems, has been a cornerstone of cybersecurity for many years. It benefits from a wealth of experience, established practices, and advanced technologies, as well as regulatory frameworks that guide its implementation and maintenance.

Conversely, the process of securing identities and access rights for non-human identities represents a much more nascent domain, but no less critical. It is tasked with addressing the unique challenges that emerge from the relatively recent upsurge of cloud-native architectures, adoption of microservices, and prevalence of automated IT operations.

This facet of IAM is being shaped by the need to secure application-to-service interactions in environments where manual interventions, such as credential rotations and developers building and maintaining auth code, are unsustainable; static identity secrets are commonplace and pose additional security risks; and traditional user-centric security models, like multifactor authentication and privileged access management, can’t neatly be translated over from human to machine. Secure workload access instead requires alternative approaches to identity and access management, such as leveraging automation to minimize secrets rotation, dynamic policy-based access control, and conditional access based on workload security posture.

The good news is the gap in maturity between user and nonhuman is narrowing as awareness grows about the importance of securing the interactions between software workloads with the same rigor applied to user access.

This decision tree-style flow chart takes you through a series of questions about your organization’s IT infrastructure, workload access controls, and general identity management practices. While this exercise is not meant to be scientific, it will help you efficiently evaluate whether you have some weaknesses in strategy that you may be overlooking – or putting off. All you need to do is walk up to the starting line, and, as they say, choose your own adventure.

Ready, set…go!

Continue Exploring

Our learning center features all the latest resources to deepen your understanding of securing workload access, including how-to guides, videos, webinars, and more.

IAM for Agentic AI: Aembit's Approach to Closing the AI Identity Gap

IAM for Agentic AI: Aembit’s Approach to Closing the AI Identity Gap

AI agents need identities of their own. Find out how Aembit makes access attributable, revocable, and least-privileged at scale.
Workload Identity Federation Resource

What is Workload Identity Federation?

A secret can grant access. It cannot prove which workload is presenting it. Trace how federation changes the equation at scale.
Aembit and CrowdStrike AIDR data sheet for AI agent identity, access control, and content inspection share image

Aembit + CrowdStrike AIDR for AI Agent Security

Aembit and CrowdStrike AIDR combine AI agent identity and MCP access controls with real-time content inspection and enforcement.